Skip to main content

State v. Arnold

Citations

  • 164 P.3d 334
  • 214 Or. App. 201
  • 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a representation by an accomplice that the accomplice is armed does not disqualify the defendant, under ORS 137.712(2)(d)(C), from receiving a lesser sentence than the mandatory minimum under ORS 137.700
  • remanding for the sentencing court to decide whether there was a substantial and compelling reason to justify a downward departure sentence
  • ORS 137.700 sentence for second-degree robbery on aiding and abetting theory of liability “indisputably is a lawful sentence”
  • appellate court may review a sentencing issue when the sentence that was imposed was an authorized sentence, but the lower court is asserted to have erroneously determined that the defendant was not eligible for a different, also legally authorized, sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.