Castro v. Maass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where trial counsel had advised the petitioner erroneously and the petitioner had entered into a stipulated-facts trial, because the post-conviction court “did not determine whether petitioner would have entered into the agreement he did were it not for counsel’s advice”
• counsel failed to explain consequences of stipulated facts trial
• counsel failed to explain consequences of stipulated facts trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).