State v. Nghia Gia Dam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentencing error involving multiple convictions was not harmless, despite the fact that the sentences were concurrent, because it was impossible to predict the impact that the error might have on a subsequent parole decision
• finding no prejudice where defense interpreter translated for State’s witness, but noting “[t]he better practice would be to have one interpreter to work with the defendant and his counsel and a different one to translate for witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).