New Mexico Supreme Court· 11/2/1989
State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 785 P.2d 224
- 109 N.M. 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “5-604 does not speak to a situation in which the parties among themselves agree to have waived the strict provisions of the rule,” but finding no such violation where prudence and common sense dictated such a result
- holding no violation where the defendant acquiesced in delay due to plea bargain, which delay inured to his benefit
- holding six-month rule suspended based on parties’ agreement that proceedings be held in abeyance- pending ruling by court on plea bargain
- stating that the defendant and his attorney's actions in signing a plea agreement after the rule date had passed indicated an implicit agreement to suspend the rule such that prudence and common sense would not require an extension
- setting aside a literal application of the six-month rule if a plea agreement is not approved
- interpreting Rule 5-604 to restart the six-month period from the date that the trial court rejected a plea agreement at a hearing, which was held before the entry of judgment and sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Montgomery, Ransom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-04-24· cited 39×
- State v. LobatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-03-15· cited 36×
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-05-28· cited 20×
- Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-11· cited 19×
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 18×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-02-13· cited 16×
- State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-05· cited 14×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-09-15· cited 13×
- State v. LucasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 12×
- State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-04-18· cited 12×
- State v. CoburnNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-05-25· cited 10×
- State v. AltherrNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-02-08· cited 8×
- County of Los Alamos v. BeckmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-09-06· cited 8×
- State v. HastingsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-09-03· cited 5×
- State v. MayfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-08-01· cited 3×
- State v. GuzmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-06-02· cited 2×
- Toby Sanchez, Jr. v. Ron Lytle, Warden Attorney General for the State of New MexicoTenth Circuit· 1998-12-16
- State v. EnlowNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-03-02
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-05-09
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 106×
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-01-15· cited 94×
- State v. AullNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-10-16· cited 51×
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-31· cited 49×
- Tomlinson v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 43×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
- State v. SegottaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-05· cited 32×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-01-26· cited 26×
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-02-01· cited 18×
- State v. CoatesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-10-16· cited 15×
- State v. TomlinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-02-02· cited 12×
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-09-21· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.