New Mexico Court of Appeals· 9/3/1993
State v. Hastings
Citations
- 862 P.2d 452
- 116 N.M. 344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- overlooking irregularities in the procedure based in part on the theory that “[t]he delay necessary to determine whether the defendant is suitable for a PPD program is clearly for the defendant’s benefit”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Donnelly, Alarid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 79×
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-31· cited 49×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-05-09· cited 34×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-11-02· cited 29×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-07-19· cited 17×
- State v. LucasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 12×
- State v. TrammelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-12-01· cited 10×
- State v. BearlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.