New Mexico Court of Appeals· 5/25/1995
State v. Coburn
Citations
- 900 P.2d 963
- 120 N.M. 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Djelay, standing alone, will not justify dismissal in the absence of a showing that the State intentionally tried to circumvent the six-month rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flores, Alarid, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
- State v. BoltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-27· cited 29×
- State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-05· cited 14×
- State v. RayburnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-04-18· cited 12×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-06-14· cited 5×
- State v. MayfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-08-01· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 105×
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-31· cited 49×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-11-02· cited 29×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-05-30· cited 22×
- State v. BudauNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-12-05· cited 15×
- State v. AltherrNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-02-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.