Skip to main content

State v. Mendoza

Citations

  • 108 N.M. 446
  • 774 P.2d 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where delays were due to competency evaluations, they were \for [the defendant's] benefit\ and the defendant was responsible for them
  • holding that where delays were due to competency evaluations, they were “for [the defendant’s] benefit” and the defendant was responsible for them
  • “Moreover, defense counsel’s reservation of his client’s rights when the suspension of the proceedings was lifted in November 1987 must be evaluated in light of its un-timeliness_”
  • discussing circumstances 11 under which the proceedings are suspended
  • mutually pursued mental exam to determine competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Baca, Minzner, Ransom, Scarborough, Sosa, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.