New Mexico Supreme Court· 5/31/1989
State v. Mendoza
Citations
- 108 N.M. 446
- 774 P.2d 440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where delays were due to competency evaluations, they were \for [the defendant's] benefit\ and the defendant was responsible for them
- holding that where delays were due to competency evaluations, they were “for [the defendant’s] benefit” and the defendant was responsible for them
- “Moreover, defense counsel’s reservation of his client’s rights when the suspension of the proceedings was lifted in November 1987 must be evaluated in light of its un-timeliness_”
- discussing circumstances 11 under which the proceedings are suspended
- mutually pursued mental exam to determine competency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Baca, Minzner, Ransom, Scarborough, Sosa, Stowers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 277×
- State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-09-29· cited 72×
- State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-16· cited 62×
- State v. RotherhamNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-05-31· cited 58×
- State v. ManzanaresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 44×
- Toby Joe Gutierrez v. Dan Moriarty, Warden, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoTenth Circuit· 1991-01-07· cited 40×
- State v. LobatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-03-15· cited 36×
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-11-02· cited 29×
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-05-28· cited 20×
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 18×
- State v. CardenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-01-29· cited 17×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-02-13· cited 16×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-09-15· cited 13×
- State v. LucasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 12×
- State v. HoffmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-08-28· cited 11×
- State v. CoburnNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-05-25· cited 10×
- State v. AltherrNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-02-08· cited 8×
- County of Los Alamos v. BeckmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-09-06· cited 8×
- State v. LittlefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-07-03· cited 7×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1969-03-11· cited 128×
- United States v. Gonzalo GonzalezEleventh Circuit· 1982-03-22· cited 92×
- Grayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-21· cited 84×
- United States v. ThirionEighth Circuit· 1987-03-05· cited 76×
- Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-08-02· cited 71×
- State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 66×
- Jones v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-13· cited 47×
- Atencio v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF PENASCO, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-22· cited 41×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 40×
- Andrews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 37×
- State v. HarveyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-05-23· cited 34×
- People v. BrowryAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-11-08· cited 31×
- State v. PendleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-03-22· cited 28×
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-12-11· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. MillardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 24×
- State v. StarcevichCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-16· cited 20×
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-02-01· cited 18×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-06-20· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.