State v. Bowers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adhering to Summerlin and holding that failure to merge convictions was appealable under ORS 138.050(1)
• rejecting request to limit the holding in Sumerlin; reasoning that “[a] disposition that includes three convictions where it should only include one conviction contains a disposition that exceeds the maximum allowable by law”
• claim that convictions should merge constitutes contention that disposition exceeds maximum allowable by law under ORS 138.050 and is preserved when raised at time of sentencing
• trial court incorrectly concluded that “the requirements of ORS 161.067(3) were not met but that it was only the ‘sentences’ that merged, not the ‘convictions’” and entered separate convictions with concurrent sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
• State v. Landahl
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 7×
• State v. Salvador
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 6×
• State v. Stanton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 3×
• State v. Haney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08