Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/21/2014
State v. Joe
Citations
- 234 Ariz. 26
- 316 P.3d 615
- 678 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 2014 WL 212591
- 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admission of prior inconsistent statement was proper to impeach witness who declined to answer questions at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howe, Orozco, Thumma
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersEighth Circuit· 1976-12-30· cited 173×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 136×
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 89×
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-26· cited 75×
- State v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-18· cited 61×
- State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-10-14· cited 43×
- State v. AllredArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-09· cited 33×
- State v. AnayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-06-28· cited 32×
- State v. HinesArizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-09· cited 16×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-05-28· cited 14×
- State v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-18· cited 11×
- State v. CarrArizona Supreme Court· 1987-10-01· cited 9×
- Goy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.