State v. Oldaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence unlawfully seized by a citizen, acting in a purely private capacity, is not subject to the exclusionary rule
• relying upon dicta in State v. Hall, 171 W.Va. 212, 298 S.E.2d 246 (1982) to establish a new principle of law
• relying upon dicta in State v. Hall, 171 W.Va. 212, 298 S.E.2d 246 (1982) to establish a new principle of law
• “A trial court ... has wide discretion in allowing rebuttal testimony after a party has rested.”
• A trial court has wide discretion in allowing rebuttal testimony after a party has rested.
• A trial court has wide discretion in allowing rebuttal testimony after a party has rested.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).