Skip to main content

State v. Gonzalez

Citations

  • 278 P.3d 328
  • 229 Ariz. 550
  • 278 P.3d 324
  • 636 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 2012 WL 2107957
  • 2012 Ariz. App. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “expert testimony as to the modus operandi of a drug organization may, depending upon the facts of the case, be admitted as evidence”
  • approving use of modus operandi evidence as circumstantial evidence of knowledge
  • “Expert testimony that drug traffickers do not entrust large quantities of drugs to unknowing transporters is not drug courier profile evidence, but rather, is modus operandi evidence.”
  • “Expert testimony that drug traffickers do not entrust large quantities of drugs to unknowing transporters is not drug courier profile evidence, but rather, is modus operandi evidence.”
  • “Unlike drug courier profile evidence, modus operandi evidence is . . . properly admitted to assist the jury in understanding the modus operandi of a drug trafficking organization.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Portley, Timmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.