State v. Lashley
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 526
Syllabus
Arson violating a protection order manifest weight fire vehicles eyewitness identification testimony credible. Affirmed. Appellant's convictions for arson and violating a protection order, which arose from an incident where the victim's vehicles were intentionally set on fire while a protection order was in place, were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Credible eyewitness identification testimony from the victim along with other testimony and evidence consistent therewith were enough to withstand the manifest-weight challenge in favor of conviction.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Smucker’s, a federal contractor, was not a state actor by complying with federal law
- holding that a food manufacturer’s vaccine mandate for employees was not a public function because “[it] is hardly unheard of for private companies to make vaccination a condition of employment”
- observing that Bivens would not apply to the plaintiffs' suit against their private employer's COVID-19 vaccine requirements
- finding that plaintiffs seeking damages under the First Amendment against a federal official had no cause of action under § 1983 and, instead, had to rely on Bivens
- suggesting that no Bivens action would lie in an analogous context
- federal contractor not a state actor for purposes of First Amendment claim arising from COVID- 19 vaccine mandate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.