State v. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he admission of the videotape [of a forensic interview] would likely be error in absence of the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-06· cited 3×
• State v. Marcus A. Wigfall
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2026-03-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Saltz
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
• State v. Freiburger
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 89×
• State v. Wise
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 71×
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Basnight
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-28· cited 25×
• State v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-10-16· cited 16×
• State v. Jolly
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-02-25· cited 15×