Stephen Arthur HOUSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a reviewing “‘court should not lightly infer that a prosecutor intends an ambiguous remark to have its most damaging meaning or that a jury, sitting through lengthy exhortation, will draw that meaning from the plethora of less damaging interpretations.’”
• with reference to a due process challenge, the \legislature and courts have created a thin but meaningfully distinguishable line\
• with reference to a due process challenge, the “legislature and courts have created a thin but meaningfully distinguishable line”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).