Skip to main content

State v. Pinder

Citations

  • 2005 UT 15
  • 114 P.3d 551
  • 520 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
  • 2005 Utah LEXIS 25
  • 2005 WL 503142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that because evidence was available or known by the defendant before the conclusion of trial, the evidence cannot be considered “newly discovered” and “cannot justify the grant of a new trial”
  • denying John‘s request for a certificate of appealability to challenge the federal district court‘s dismissal of his habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Durham, Wilkins, Parrish, Nehring, Durrant'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.