Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/11/2019

State v. Rosenbaum

Citations

826 S.E.2d 18
305 Ga. 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that State properly brought appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4) when court excluded evidence as having been illegally obtained in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights
explaining that OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4) applies when the State appeals an order suppressing or excluding evidence on the ground that it was obtained illegally
noting that, when a trial judge sits as the trier of fact and hears evidence, “his findings based upon conflicting evidence are analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support them” (citation and punctuation omitted)
affirming suppression based in part on unreasonable delay between search and seizure where “the State made no showing of particular complexity, difficulty in drafting the warrant, or competing demands on a limited number of officers”
Eleventh Circuit decisions are not binding in Georgia courts, although this Court can consider them as persuasive authority.
when this Court reviews a ruling on a motion to suppress, we defer to the factual findings of the trial court unless clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.