Eleventh Circuit· 4/22/2009
United States v. Mitchell
Citations
- 565 F.3d 1347
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258
- 2009 WL 1067212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a 21-day 6 delay between seizure and application for a search warrant was unreasonable
- holding that a twenty-one day delay in securing a warrant for a laptop search was unreasonable
- holding that a delay in obtaining a warrant was not justified but acknowledging that some delay to seek assistance of another officer may be reasonable
- recognizing that “overriding circumstances . . . necessitating the diversion of law enforcement personnel to another case” might justify some delay in seeking a warrant
- explaining that an unreasonable delay in obtaining the search warrant is unconstitutional because its manner of execution unreasonably “infringes possessory interests” the Fourth Amendment protects
- noting that delay may be reasonable where “some overriding circumstances arose, necessitating the diversion of law enforcement personnel to another case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Barkett, Korman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. StabileThird Circuit· 2011-02-01· cited 204×
- United States v. BurgessTenth Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 142×
- United States v. Edward SullivanNinth Circuit· 2015-07-29· cited 92×
- United States v. BurgardSeventh Circuit· 2012-04-02· cited 67×
- United States v. ChristieTenth Circuit· 2013-06-11· cited 59×
- United States v. David Bishop LaistEleventh Circuit· 2012-12-11· cited 56×
- United States v. ClutterEighth Circuit· 2012-03-26· cited 43×
- United States v. Jennifer A. SparksEleventh Circuit· 2015-12-01· cited 43×
- United States v. Daniel BrownFourth Circuit· 2012-12-06· cited 40×
- United States v. SmithSecond Circuit· 2020-07-28· cited 39×
- United States v. Samuel PrattFourth Circuit· 2019-02-08· cited 32×
- State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-03-11· cited 31×
- United States v. Darrell Mark BabcockEleventh Circuit· 2019-05-24· cited 29×
- United States v. WinnS.D. Illinois· 2015-02-09· cited 19×
- United States v. Darvill BraggEighth Circuit· 2022-08-15· cited 19×
- United States v. Mario SmithEighth Circuit· 2013-06-06· cited 15×
- United States v. Edward SullivanNinth Circuit· 2014-05-28· cited 11×
- State v. NeissMontana Supreme Court· 2019-06-04· cited 10×
- Abidor v. NapolitanoE.D. New York· 2013-12-31· cited 9×
- Woods (Leonard) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-11-03· cited 6×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court· 1992-12-08· cited 1,151×
- United States v. George Dean MartinSecond Circuit· 1998-07-02· cited 94×
- State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-16· cited 67×
- United States v. Michael A. RespressSixth Circuit· 1993-11-09· cited 45×
- United States v. Neem Shiva Dass and Ma Surina Dasi, Marvin Neer, Gerald TerpakNinth Circuit· 1988-06-13· cited 44×
- United States v. Ibukun O. MayomiSeventh Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 44×
- United States v. Arlease PrevoEleventh Circuit· 2006-01-11· cited 28×
- United States v. Genaro Rafael Hernandez-CanoEleventh Circuit· 1987-01-23· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.