Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 4/22/2009

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 565 F.3d 1347
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258
  • 2009 WL 1067212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a 21-day 6 delay between seizure and application for a search warrant was unreasonable
  • holding that a twenty-one day delay in securing a warrant for a laptop search was unreasonable
  • holding that a delay in obtaining a warrant was not justified but acknowledging that some delay to seek assistance of another officer may be reasonable
  • recognizing that “overriding circumstances . . . necessitating the diversion of law enforcement personnel to another case” might justify some delay in seeking a warrant
  • explaining that an unreasonable delay in obtaining the search warrant is unconstitutional because its manner of execution unreasonably “infringes possessory interests” the Fourth Amendment protects
  • noting that delay may be reasonable where “some overriding circumstances arose, necessitating the diversion of law enforcement personnel to another case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Barkett, Korman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.