Skip to main content

Perez v. State

Citations

  • 657 S.E.2d 846
  • 283 Ga. 196
  • 8 Fulton County D. Rep. 582
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 186
  • 8 FCDR 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that, pursuant to Davis, the defendant’s custodial statement was admissible because his alleged assertion of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent was ambiguous and the interrogating officer had no obligation to clarify his intent
  • “ ‘We see no reason to apply a different rule to equivocal invocations of the right to cut off questioning.’ [Cit.]”
  • “The decisions of the Eleventh Circuit are not binding on this Court, but they are persuasive authority. [Cit.]”
  • “The decisions of the Eleventh Circuit are not binding on this Court, but they are persuasive authority.”
  • “I can stop the interrogation . . . [r]ight or no?” was at best ambiguous assertion of right
  • “A person being subjected to custodial interrogation may at any time express his or her desire to remain silent and, thereby, end the interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.