State v. Strickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order granting a motion “to exclude evidence on the ground that it was obtained in violation of law” is appealable under the materially identical predecessor to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4)
• involving the grant of a pre-trial motion in limine, “excluding evidence of the results of a breath test claimed to have been made in violation of OCGA § 40-6-392 and the regulations of the Department of Public Safety”
• “[W]e deem the enactment of the appeal statute to he remedial in nature. . . . Being remedial in nature, it should be construed liberally.”
• “Assuredly, the right of appeal provided to the state in the statute should not be frustrated by the manner in which the [defendant] names his motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).