Skip to main content

State v. Cash

Citations

  • 298 Ga. 90
  • 779 S.E.2d 603
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the collateral order doctrine did not apply to an order denying the State’s motion to recuse the trial judge
  • explaining that although some grounds for a motion for new trial “do or may require new evidence,” other grounds “do not require new evidence”
  • explaining that “the State may not appeal any issue in a criminal case, whether by direct or discretionary appeal, unless that issue is listed in OCGA § 5-7-1” (punctuation omitted)
  • An order denying the State’s motion to recuse the trial judge could not fall under the collateral order doctrine as, in the circumstances presented, there was no statutory authority for such an appeal.
  • “[T]he Appellate Practice Act, see OCGA §§ 5-6-30 to 5-6-51 . . . grants the right of appeal only to either party in any civil case and the defendant in any criminal proceeding.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • “[T]he Appellate Practice Act, see OCGA §§ 5-6-30 to 5-6-51 . . . grants the right of appeal only to either party in any civil case and the defendant in any criminal proceeding.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.