Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/31/1999

State v. Rosario

Citations

987 P.2d 226
195 Ariz. 264
303 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1999 Ariz. App. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Arizona applies the prison mailbox rule in pro se post-conviction proceedings
noting that a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must be based on something more than “mere speculation”
noting the showing of prejudice needed to obtain relief on an IAC claim “must be that of a provable reality, not mere speculation”
determining plea involuntary if defendant “based his decision to plead to the offenses based upon his [mistaken] belief that he could be paroled at one-half of his incarceration terms”
noting burden to show an ineffective assistance of counsel claim “is on the petitioner and the showing must be that of a provable reality, not mere speculation”
explaining the rule’s rationale is that pro se prisoners are unable to ensure pleadings are timely filed because they cannot personally file pleadings in the clerk’s office or directly place pleadings in the mail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Jefferson, Lankford, Sheldon, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Rosario

44 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.