State v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judge must be present in the courtroom while evidence is being introduced
• absence not reversible error unless it is shown to have prejudiced defendant
• reviewing court must search record for fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rosario
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-08-31· cited 87×
• Raymond F. Riley v. George Deeds
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 55×
• State v. Jordan
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-30· cited 38×
• Coddington v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-05-13· cited 38×
• State v. Patterson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-22· cited 31×
• State v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-08-31· cited 24×
• State v. Ball
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-06-09· cited 12×
• State v. Cagnina
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-09-15· cited 9×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-11-12· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Burrell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-09· cited 72×
• State v. Prewitt
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-28· cited 35×
• State v. Johnson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-02-02· cited 20×
• Sargent v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-04-13· cited 12×
• State v. Jefferson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 10×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-20· cited 9×
• State v. Eberhardt
  Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court· 1972-03-22· cited 8×
• Willmon v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-02-03· cited 6×
• State v. Denson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-15· cited 6×