Skip to main content

Mayer v. State

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 56
  • 184 Ariz. 242
  • 205 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When there is no clear record as to when the [filing] was delivered to prison authorities, the proper course of action is to remand to the trial court to make this determination.”
  • “[P]ro se prisoner is deemed to have filed his notice of appeal at the time it is delivered, properly addressed, to the proper prison authorities to be forwarded to the clerk of the superior court.”
  • “Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to consider appeals that are not timely filed.”
  • “[A] pro se prisoner is deemed to have filed his notice of appeal at the time it is delivered, properly addressed, to the proper prison authorities to be forwarded to the clerk of the superior court.”
  • petition for review to Arizona Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toci, Voss, Fidel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.