State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an ambiguity exists when the text “may be reasonably understood in two or more ways”
• recognizing language, context, background, and purpose of rule as guides to interpretation
• providing that comments to rules inform our interpretation
• ambiguity exists when statute can be reasonably read in two ways
• ambiguity exists when statute can be reasonably read in two ways

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).