Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/26/1994

State v. Hite

Citations

131 Or. App. 59
883 P.2d 890
1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

proffered exhibits irrelevant because they did not corroborate victim’s testimony that defendant took nude photographs of her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Rossman, Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McCapes
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-06· cited 3×
State v. Gallegos
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-06-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Hampton
Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 94×
State v. Isom
Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 79×
State v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 22×
State v. Gailey
Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 22×
State v. Rood
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-03· cited 15×
State v. Millar
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-23· cited 9×
State v. Vanderham
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-16· cited 7×
State v. Hunter
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-22· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.