Arizona Supreme Court· 9/27/1996

State v. Rogers

Citations

924 P.2d 1027
186 Ariz. 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that a reasonable person would not feel free to leave when the officer held out his badge and stated, “police officers, we need to talk to you”
stressing necessity of making factual record below in order for appellate court to decide fact-intensive issue and base holding on it
stating an investigatory stop is a seizure that is justified under the Fourth Amendment if it is “‘supported by reasonable suspicion’ that criminal activity is afoot”
finding investigatory stop unlawful where officers articulated only that it was dark, that defendant and his companion emerged from bushes and walked down the middle of the street, and that defendant stared at officers
a person is in custody when police officers, suspecting criminal activity, approach a suspect and say, “police officers, we need to talk to you.”
reasonable person would not have felt free to disregard police when officer approached and stated, “police officers, we need to talk to you”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Martone, Feldman, Zlaeet, Corcoran, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.