State v. Orantez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that new evidence “would have likely resulted in a different verdict” and thus “probably change[d] the verdict”
• concluding that new evidence “would have likely resulted in a different verdict” and thus “probably change[d] the verdict”
• concluding that new evidence “would have likely resulted in a different verdict” and thus “probably change[d] the verdict”
• finding defendant entitled to new trial where evidence showed key witness lied 16 about her drug use and likely had drugs in her system at the time of the crime
• \Evidence of intoxication at the time of observation is admissible to attack a witness on [his] ability to perceive and remember.\
• discussing impeachment of witness based on drug use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).