Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/5/2004
State v. Watkins
Citations
- 88 P.3d 1174
- 207 Ariz. 562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Contraband may be seized if during a lawful frisk, the officer feels an object he knows is contraband without the need to manipulate it.”
- “Furtive movements near the waist support the inference that a person may be armed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lankford, Kessler, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-03· cited 33×
- State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court· 2005-04-05· cited 24×
- State v. RivasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-15· cited 20×
- State v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-28· cited 18×
- In re Tyreke H.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-05· cited 9×
- Doucette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-05-30· cited 7×
- State v. WoldtNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-04-08· cited 5×
- State v. SieversNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-05-18
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Illinois v. LidsterSupreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 398×
- State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 143×
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-18· cited 110×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-21· cited 70×
- State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 54×
- State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court· 1996-09-27· cited 53×
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-16· cited 47×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-04-03· cited 44×
- State v. BriggsArizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-24· cited 39×
- State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-29· cited 39×
- City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 37×
- Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-17· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.