Skip to main content

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 785 So. 2d 759
  • 2001 WL 608990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellee was not in custody when he was questioned at the police station and confronted with incriminating recorded phone calls
  • holding that appellee was not in custody when he was questioned at the police station and confronted with incriminating recorded phone calls
  • holding that, in the absence of any indicia of coercion or intimidating circumstances, being confronted by the police with incriminating evidence did not convert the otherwise consensual encounter into a custodial interrogation
  • holding that defendant was not in custody where he arrived and left station on his own volition, interview room was not locked, there was no indicia of coercion or intimidating circumstances, and defendant was told he was free to leave at any time
  • defendant informed that \he was free to leave at any time\
  • defendant informed that “he was free, to leave at any time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Sorondo, J., and Nesbitt, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.