Stinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• error previously considered fundamental could no longer be raised for the first time on appeal, citing amendments to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b) and Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(on motion for rehearing; questions certified to the Florida Supreme Court)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-19· cited 19×
• State v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-06· cited 9×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-11· cited 8×
• Geri v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-19· cited 5×
• Horttor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harvey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-20· cited 25×
• Clay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-04· cited 18×
• Stanford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-17· cited 16×
• State v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-06· cited 9×
• Malone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 4×