United States v. Akeem Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s characterization of Rule 404(b)’s list of permissible purposes as inclusive, “Rule 404(b
• stating that, notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s characterization of Rule 404(b)’s list of permissible purposes as inclusive, “Rule 404(b
• explaining that the Rule ensures “an accused is tried for what he did, not who he is”
• stating that, notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s characterization of Rule 404(b)’s list of permissible purposes as inclusive, “Rule 404(b
• explaining that the Government “can prove possession of a firearm for purposes of § 922(g)(1)” by actual or constructive possession
• stating that limiting instructions “must” be given if requested but only “should” be issued close to the evidence’s introduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).