United States v. Esau Jackson, United States of America v. Clarence Gene Scroggins, United States of America v. William Franklin Dancy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the danger of guilt by association “was heightened by the inflammatory nature of much of the evidence presented”
• recognizing the danger of guilt by association “was heightened by the inflammatory nature of much of the evidence presented”
• finding the probative value of a prior conviction was further enhanced by the critical role a defendant's credibility would have played if he had chosen to testify
• finding no unconstitutional judicial bias when there was no indication that the judge’s “very limited involvement in the presentation of evidence” compromised his impartiality
• “danger that evidence of the other defendants’ guilt would be imputed to [defendant] was heightened by the inflammatory nature of much of the evidence presented”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).