Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 616 P.2d 406
  • 94 N.M. 693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “under the excited utterance doctrine, there is no definite or fixed limit on time”
  • finding no abuse of discretion in the court’s decision to wait until after voir dire before determining if impartial jury could be selected but in no way intimating that such a process would be required
  • “A trial court is allowed wide discretion in determining whether in fact a declarant is still under the influence of the startling event when the statement is made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Felter, Federici, Byrd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.