New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/10/1996

State v. Ross

Citations

919 P.2d 1080
122 N.M. 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a statement not offered to prove either of its assertions was not hearsay
holding that Idaho’s residual hearsay exception, Idaho Rules of Evidence (IRE) Rule 803(24), was not a firmly rooted hearsay exception
holding that objection to hearsay on the ground that it violated constitution and due process was sufficient to raise Confrontation Clause of Sixth Amendment issue
holding error to be harmless in part because defendant \failed to offer substantial conflicting evidence to discredit the State's testimony\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
relying on corroborative evidence based on Wright
relying on corroborative evidence based on Wright

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minzner, Baca, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.