State v. Manus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by testimony of rebuttal witness who was not disclosed as a witness for the State because defense counsel was given an opportunity to depose the witness before his testimony
• holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by testimony of rebuttal witness who was not disclosed as a witness for the State because defense counsel was given an opportunity to depose the witness before his testimony
• holding voluntary manslaughter instruction not required where defendant’s testimony is exculpatory and does not indicate provocation or heat of passion
• explaining that the state must prove that the act constituting aggravated assault \was done with a general criminal intent\
• declaring that “[t]his type of gamesmanship in the conduct of a criminal trial is not to be commended”
• declaring that \[t]his type of gamesmanship in the conduct of a criminal trial is not to be commended\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).