United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that constitutional provisions should be interpreted “with an eye to syntax, history, initial principle, and extension of fundamental purpose”
• noting that DWR’s most important task is to provide technical assistance during adjudication proceedings
• stating a general policy of declining review by \special action\ of orders denying motions to dismiss, on the grounds that the remedy by appeal is usually adequate
• stating a general policy of declining review by “special action” of orders denying motions to dismiss, on the grounds that the remedy by appeal is usually adequate
• adopting supplementary statutory provision that did not unreasonably limit or hamper judicial system
• ‘We must interpret the statute with common sense and, if possible, in a manner consistent with constitutional principle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).