Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/31/2001

State v. King

Citations

34 P.3d 739
177 Or. App. 373
2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming determination of “danger to others” based on the appellant’s reoccurring decompressions, the need for restraints during an episode in the hospital, and a nurse’s testimony that the appellant’s illness could cause him to strike out
commission of an overt violent act is not a prerequisite to a prediction of future dangerousness
commission of an overt violent act is not a prerequisite to a prediction of future dangerousness
“Whether a person falls within the definition of the statute is determined by his condition at the time of the hearing as understood in the context of his history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Kistler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.