United States v. Henrietta Faye Ell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although “prejudice is presumed” “when a court fails to comply with Rule 615,” harmless error analysis is nonetheless appropriate
• explaining Rule 615 sequestration orders still apply after a witness finishes testifying
• violation of Rule 615 creates presumption of prejudice against defendant and requires reversal unless it is “manifestly clear” that error was harmless
• violation of Rule 615 ↩ creates presumption of prejudice against defendant and requires reversal unless it is \manifestly clear\ that error was harmless
• cases where the court improperly refuses to order the exclusion of witnesses at a defendant’s request are “not controlled by those Ninth Circuit cases that consider the appropriate remedy when a witness violates an exclusionary rule order____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).