Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 716 N.E.2d 948
  • 1999 Ind. LEXIS 885
  • 1999 WL 784074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prison guard, who was the only person that could assist in the cross-examination of inmates, was an “essential witness” under Rule 615
  • concluding that testimony from prison officer that he was familiar with defendant and contents of his offend er packet was sufficient to establish that defendant was person named in certified documentation of prior unrelated convictions
  • acknowledging that Rule 615 clause 3 is typically invoked for an expert witness rather than a fact witness
  • trial court required to grant motions for separation of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Rule, Selby, Boehm, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.