Washington Supreme Court· 4/15/1999
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 137 Wash. 2d 712
- 976 P.2d 1229
- 1999 Wash. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where legislature uses certain statutory language in one instance and different language in another, there is a difference in legislative intent
- Failure to act does not establish complicity. This remains true even if the person had a duty to act. For example a person's failure to protect his or her child from assault does not make the person an accomplice in that assault.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Talmadge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 352×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court· 2005-02-10· cited 252×
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-10· cited 203×
- State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 186×
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 180×
- In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 171×
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 154×
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 146×
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 128×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 108×
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 102×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 102×
- State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 99×
- McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-06· cited 95×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 94×
- McClarty v. Totem ElectricWashington Supreme Court· 2006-07-06· cited 93×
- State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-05· cited 88×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 223×
- State v. ByrdWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 184×
- John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court· 1991-11-14· cited 141×
- State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-26· cited 112×
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 105×
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1978-11-16· cited 100×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 89×
- State v. EastmondWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 86×
- In Re Adoption of LybbertWashington Supreme Court· 1969-04-10· cited 60×
- Seeber v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1981-10-01· cited 59×
- State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 52×
- Rhoad v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANYWashington Supreme Court· 1984-08-30· cited 49×
- Ball v. Stokely Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1950-08-31· cited 34×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-05-03· cited 33×
- State v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-12· cited 30×
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-28· cited 30×
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-05-11· cited 27×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-29· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.