Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pending appeal does not divest trial court of jurisdiction to take further action when action does not affect judgment on appeal
• holding that, in collateral matters not involved in the appeal, such as determining the propriety and amount of attorney fees, the trial court retains jurisdiction
• stating that a district court always retains jurisdiction to enforce 11 and give effect to the terms of a judgment
• observing that an appellate court will raise jurisdictional questions on its 8 own motion
• observing that an appellate court will raise jurisdictional 15 questions on its own motion
• providing that an order 2 or judgment is not considered final unless all issues of law and fact have been 3 determined and the case disposed of by the trial court to the fullest extent possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).