New Mexico Supreme Court· 9/9/2008

State v. Rivera

Citations

192 P.3d 1213
144 N.M. 836
2008 NMSC 056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the Confrontation Clause does not apply to pretrial suppression hearings
\[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that a defendant's right to confront witnesses against him is primarily a trial right. . . .\
\[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that a defendant's right to confront witnesses against him is primarily a trial right . . . .\
“At a suppression hearing, the court may rely on 17 hearsay and other evidence, even though that evidence would not be admissible at 18 trial.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bosson, Chávez, Serna, Maes, Daniels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.