Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/26/1977
Stacey v. State
Citations
- 569 P.2d 640
- 30 Or. App. 1075
- 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying due process requirements to the addition of a probation condition with- out notice to the probationer, but expressly not considering Cite as 347 Or App 437 (2026) 439 whether notice requirements applied to addition of general terms of probation under ORS 137.540
- applying due process requirements to the addition of a probation condition with- out notice to the probationer, but expressly not considering Cite as 347 Or App 437 (2026) 439 whether notice requirements applied to addition of general terms of probation under ORS 137.540
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Tanzer, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-03· cited 60×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-02-07· cited 35×
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-24· cited 32×
- Fox v. StateWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-07-16· cited 21×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-22· cited 15×
- Simmons v. JamesD. Kansas· 1979-03-30· cited 4×
- State v. MaloufCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-25· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court· 1884-03-03· cited 1,005×
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 365×
- United States v. BehrensSupreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 173×
- State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 82×
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-01-12· cited 55×
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-11-08· cited 36×
- People v. EmigSupreme Court of Colorado· 1972-01-31· cited 34×
- Lerch v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-05-18· cited 27×
- State v. GetsingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-11-15· cited 17×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-24· cited 13×
- State v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1896-06-23· cited 13×
- Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1857-07-15· cited 12×
- DeBolt v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-11-25· cited 8×
- Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1929-02-23· cited 5×
- State v. WanrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-07-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.