State v. Strader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant established the minimal factual nexus under Hall where, “but for” the unlawful stop, the officer would not have been in a position to ask for the defendant’s consent
• retaining identification after the time necessary to complete initial lawful stop is an unlawful seizure
• retaining identification after the time necessary to complete initial lawful stop is an unlawful seizure
• a stop occurred when an officer, lacking reasonable suspicion, approached the defendant, asked for identification, and used it to run a warrant check

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cohan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 3×
• State v. Robbins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-25· cited 2×
• State v. Parra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Birchfield
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 69×
• State v. Shaff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 66×
• State v. Highley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-26· cited 29×
• State v. Rider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-28· cited 24×
• State v. Ayles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 16×