Skip to main content

State v. Chambers

Citations

  • 203 P.3d 337
  • 226 Or. App. 363
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “assuming without deciding that” removing defendant from train out of concern for his welfare was “constitutionally permissible”
  • the defendant, who was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, had shown the requisite “but for” connection because the officer observed the concealed knife in the defendant’s rear pants pocket when the defendant had leaned over during the unlawful seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Huckleberry, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.