Oregon Supreme Court· 8/10/2000
State v. Riddle
Citations
- 8 P.3d 980
- 330 Or. 471
- 2000 Ore. LEXIS 629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that expert opinions not derived from a communication between the expert and the client or attorney were not privileged, and a communication is an interchange of thoughts or opinions
- reversing and remanding only the convictions that were affected by the trial court’s error
- interpreting ORS 135.855(1)(a), a statute governing the different procedures in criminal discovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 84×
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-07-05· cited 34×
- Holt v. McCastlainSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-05-20· cited 10×
- Klamath County School District v. TeameyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-02· cited 9×
- Port of Portland v. Oregon Center for Environmental HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 5×
- Brown v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-17· cited 5×
- State v. SavinskiyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-14· cited 5×
- Sultan v. Earing-DoudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 4×
- Moon v. GOVERNMENT STANDARDS AND PRACTICESCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-09· cited 4×
- City of Portland v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-10· cited 3×
- Atkeson v. T & K Lands, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-28· cited 2×
- Pope, Curtis Wayne Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 127×
- United States Ex Rel. Edney v. SmithE.D. New York· 1976-11-24· cited 87×
- Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1962-09-26· cited 41×
- State v. HartfieldOregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 39×
- BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1960-11-09· cited 25×
- Hayutin v. Colorado State Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-06-07· cited 11×
- State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 10×
- State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-08-26· cited 3×
- State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.