Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/26/1998
State v. Riddle
Citations
- 964 P.2d 1056
- 155 Or. App. 526
- 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- states conclusion concerning scope of attorney-client privilege in one paragraph, in next paragraph supports conclusion by cases based on work product doctrine
- paragraph begins by referring to the work product doctrine, moves to a case that discusses the attorney-client privilege, and closes with an article and a case on the work product doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Muniz, De Muniz, Warren, Deits, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-05-15· cited 240×
- United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezThird Circuit· 1975-07-16· cited 166×
- United States Ex Rel. Edney v. SmithE.D. New York· 1976-11-24· cited 87×
- Houston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-11-16· cited 79×
- Hutchinson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-08· cited 51×
- Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1962-09-26· cited 41×
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-03-22· cited 38×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-14· cited 36×
- Stumpf v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-06-27· cited 30×
- BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1960-11-09· cited 25×
- Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-11· cited 12×
- State v. BockornyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-22· cited 12×
- Dyer v. R. E. Christiansen Trucking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 10×
- Dyer v. R. E. Christiansen Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-24· cited 7×
- State v. BockornyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-23· cited 7×
- State v. McGrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-05-12· cited 5×
- Lavitch v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1960-11-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.