Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/1/1987

State v. Rice

Citations

737 P.2d 726
48 Wash. App. 7
1987 Wash. App. LEXIS 3664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting evidence could confuse the issues for the jury by focusing attention away from the charged burglary
\[r]elevant evidence encompasses facts that present both direct and circumstantial evidence of any element of a claim or defense\
the determination of the relevancy of a particular piece of evidence will not be reversed absent a manifest abuse of discretion
trial court did not abuse discretion by excluding minimally probative evidence that was likely to confuse jurors
in determining prejudice, the linchpin word is \unfair\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster, Ringold, Grosse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.