Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/6/2003
State v. Gladden
Citations
- 116 Wash. App. 561
- 66 P.3d 1095
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that defense counsel may have strategically decided that an objection would draw attention to the information he sought to exclude
- defense counsel did not object to witness statement about defendant moving “when he got out of prison”
- failure to object could be described as legitimate trial tactic because counsel wanted to avoid drawing attention to the remark
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kurtz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-06· cited 93×
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-01· cited 82×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-10-23· cited 73×
- State v. SchimmelpfennigWashington Supreme Court· 1979-05-03· cited 61×
- State v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-28· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.