Skip to main content
· 7/19/1993

State v. Hettich

Citations

  • 854 P.2d 1112
  • 70 Wash. App. 586
  • 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • doubting the Frye standard would apply because the witness’ testimony was not based on novel scientific experimental procedures, “ ‘but rather upon his own practical experience and acquired knowledge.’ ” (quoting Ortiz, 119 Wn.2d at 311)
  • Rule 609(c) bars admission of a prior conviction only where there has been an express finding that the person convicted has been rehabilitated
  • “[T]he Frye argument was not raised below, and therefore need not be considered on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.