· 7/19/1993
State v. Hettich
Citations
- 854 P.2d 1112
- 70 Wash. App. 586
- 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doubting the Frye standard would apply because the witness’ testimony was not based on novel scientific experimental procedures, “ ‘but rather upon his own practical experience and acquired knowledge.’ ” (quoting Ortiz, 119 Wn.2d at 311)
- Rule 609(c) bars admission of a prior conviction only where there has been an express finding that the person convicted has been rehabilitated
- “[T]he Frye argument was not raised below, and therefore need not be considered on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.